The Talent Meridian Framework
A working paper on why ambitious professionals from emerging markets face asymmetric returns to effort, and how to design systems that correct the asymmetry.
In preparationMy scholarship asks how educators make sense of students' reasoning under conditions of complexity, and how institutions can be designed to move ambition across borders. These look like two questions. They are one question, asked at two scales.
Prospectus successfully defended, October 2025. Currently in the analytical phase, with fifth-grade pilot data as the primary focus.
The study examines what elementary teachers attend to, and how they interpret, student reasoning when mathematical argumentation is embedded inside coding-infused science and mathematics lessons. I am using an adapted four-component framework (Framing, Attending, Interpreting, Responding) developed from pilot analysis with three participating teachers.
The central finding emerging from pilot analysis is specific and consequential: teachers systematically experience coding and mathematics as sequential rather than integrated, which renders argumentation embedded in coding decisions largely invisible. The dissertation extends this finding across additional cases and refines the framework's binary assessment designations.
The work is advised by Dr. AnnMarie Conner and supported by National Science Foundation-funded research at the University of Georgia.
How teachers attend to, interpret, and respond to student thinking in integrated STEM contexts; the role of professional noticing frameworks in supporting equitable classroom discourse; situative perspectives on teacher learning.
The social and institutional conditions under which underserved students access, persist in, and thrive in STEM education. Informed by grassroots work through the Aspire Uyiosa Achievers Foundation and sustained engagement with schools in Nigeria and the United States.
How mathematical reasoning develops inside coding-infused and cross-disciplinary STEM lessons; what teachers attend to, what they miss, and what instructional moves support rigorous student argumentation in these integrated settings.
A selected list. For the complete record, see Google Scholar.
Assessment of Mathematics Students' Knowledge and Attitude Towards Cloud Computing
Conference Proposal — PME-NA 2026
UGA College of Education Research Conference Presentation
Equity and EQUIP: Connecting Research to Practice
Pillar essays that live here permanently; shorter, weekly pieces go out through The Academic Playbook newsletter.
A working paper on why ambitious professionals from emerging markets face asymmetric returns to effort, and how to design systems that correct the asymmetry.
In preparationOn the integration problem in elementary STEM, and what teachers actually see when asked to notice argumentation inside computational tasks.
In preparationA counter-argument to the exit-from-academia discourse: why the strategic move for most PhD students is to win the game they are already in, on their own terms.
In preparationOn the global intellectual diaspora and the institutional infrastructure required to make it generative for both origin and destination.
In preparation